EVGA 01G-P3-1080-TR GeForce GTX285 for Mac 1024 MB DDR3 PCI-Express 2.0 Graphics Card

Comment: I bought the card primarily for gaming purposes and the card does this great. I am a little saddened that a card made for Mac products did not include a mini display port on the back, only two DVI outputs. I went down to my local Apple store to purchase an adapter and found out they sell this adapter for $150. I got online and purchased the Gefen adapter from Amazon for 75 dollars. If you are not using the newer cinema displays you are ok but if you have the new models just be warned that this card is going to cost you more money.

If this card had a mini display port I would have given the card 5 stars.

Comment: I imagine the card works fine, but the description does not disclose that it does not work with the earlier versions of MacPro. It should say
"Requires Mac Pro (Early 2009 with 1066MHz DDR3 memory) or Mac Pro (Early 2008 with 800MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM memory) with PCI Express 2.0 slot. Card is not compatible with version ____ and 1,1..."

Also, the instructions that are included do not say anything about installing the driver at all. So before removing your old card, be sure to run the included installer and it will check to see if your system will support the card (I regretfully installed the card first which waisted a lot of time, as the power cables are very small for full size hands to install) Since most video cards don't need drivers on a Mac, it is easy to overlook.

Comment: This is the fastest 3D graphics card you can get for the Mac, as of this writing. Installation was trouble-free in both OS X 10.6.1 and Windows 7 64-bit in Boot Camp. My system is a dual quad 2.8GHz Mac Pro (early 2008 model). I took out the stock ATI 2600 card before putting this one into the x16 PCI Express 2.0 slot.

In OS X, I didn't have to do anything, as drivers for the 285 GTX are included in 10.6.1. I did end up downloading newer drivers in Windows after installing the 285. Several days later Windows prompted me to upgrade the drivers again. Adding the card caused Windows 7 to require reactivation.

For Windows gaming users only:
Here are performance numbers from the Crysis Benchmark Tool running on the free Crysis Demo (not the release version of Crysis). These are using the 32-bit timedemo. Using the 64-bit timedemo with the release version of Crysis may give better results. Crysis' graphics will pretty much hammer any system, so don't let the low FPS numbers fool you. It's the most demanding game out there. Just about any other game will run very, very smooth.

The first run below is for 1920x1200 all settings Very High. The second run is for 1920x1200, all settings High. These are good scores for a single-GPU product.

Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1900x1200, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: VeryHigh
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 92.80s, Average FPS: 21.55
Min FPS: 13.56 at frame 140, Max FPS: 26.43 at frame 987
Average Tri/Sec: -8614124, Tri/Frame: -399700
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.29
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 85.34s, Average FPS: 23.44
Min FPS: 13.56 at frame 140, Max FPS: 26.87 at frame 977
Average Tri/Sec: -9052859, Tri/Frame: -386291
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.37
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 85.03s, Average FPS: 23.52
Min FPS: 13.56 at frame 140, Max FPS: 27.25 at frame 988
Average Tri/Sec: -9044847, Tri/Frame: -384521
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.38
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1900x1200, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 58.91s, Average FPS: 33.95
Min FPS: 25.29 at frame 1954, Max FPS: 44.74 at frame 999
Average Tri/Sec: -31958906, Tri/Frame: -941329
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.97
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 51.76s, Average FPS: 38.64
Min FPS: 25.29 at frame 1954, Max FPS: 47.99 at frame 76
Average Tri/Sec: -35900052, Tri/Frame: -929133
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.99
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 52.20s, Average FPS: 38.31
Min FPS: 25.29 at frame 1954, Max FPS: 47.99 at frame 76
Average Tri/Sec: -35593324, Tri/Frame: -928977
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.99
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Comment: I was looking for a nice upgrade to my 8800 GT in my Mac Pro. I was having some issues with one of my favorite games and after trying all the configuration tweaks and the like I decided this card would give me the most bang for my buck. The advice on the web indicated that you needed to install the drivers first and then the card. Following those instructions, installation was a snap. The hardest part of the installation was hooking up the power cables to the mother board. If you work in a well lit area this should not be a huge issue. I was afraid that this new card would greatly increase the noise level in my home office, but I have found this card to be as quiet as the 8800 GT. Finally, the performance is so far beyond my expectations I think I'll be more than satisfied with this card for years.

Comment: I got this for my Mac Pro (8 core; early 2009 model) to boost 3D application and gaming performance. My summary:

(1) There was no appreciable real-world performance boost when compared to the stock video card that comes with the Mac Pro.
(2) NVIDIA hasn't provided any updated drivers since July 2, 2009.
(3) Search for GeForce 285 Mac and game crashes in Google and you can see how many games have issues with this specific card (with no solutions known to date).


At this price point, the target consumer for this card, I would assume, are gamers. Yet on the few games I occasionally play (all 3D FPS type games), I've found absolutely no noticeable improvement either in terms of quality or speed. Even worse, my system would randomly lock up, so badly that the only way to recover is to cycle the power. Look on Google and you'll see many reports of this. The suggested fixes are along the lines of: 1) install a SMC fan control utility; 2) lower the graphics quality; or 3) return the card. I haven't returned it yet but neither of the other two suggested fixes solves my issues (and it hasn't for many other users).

The support for this card is terrible. Look on the support forums for this card and the affected software and you'll find the same "fixes" to try I mentioned above. Nowhere will you find a solution. As I stated before, there hasn't been a new driver since July 2, 2009, and even with these issues, no announcement of a release date for the next revision.

I recently upgraded to Snow Leopard (10.6.1). The good news is that the Snow Leopard disc has the drivers for this card--so you don't need to remove the card prior to doing an installation of the OS. Unfortunately, I have the same problems I had before.

So, I basically have an expensive brick (this card is huge) in my Mac Pro sucking juice. On the positive side, this card isn't loud at all. But then again, I've never had a chance to really test it under load without it crashing.

I strongly recommend everyone to wait until NVIDIA releases a new set of drivers that addresses the current issues. Or, just stick with the card shipped with the Mac Pro, as in retrospect, it seems to meet all my needs.